Is there yogic knowledge of prana, bandha, kosha, skandha, chakra, self (atman), self (purusha), God (ishvara), Brahman (the Absolute),
Nirvana?
Is yogic experience, like sense experience, a source of knowledge?
A. The parallelism question
1. The cognitive value of sense experience: the "Theory of Appearing"
If S takes something a to appear to herself as F, then she has a prima facie ("defeasible") reason for believing that a is F (Fa).
2. Similarities between sense and yogic experience
a. experience is taken by the subject to reveal realities
b. compelling character
c. checks for differentiating veridical and non-veridical experiences3. Dissimilarities
a. lack of universality (see C & D)
b. nature of the object(s) taken to be revealed
B. Testimony and the principle of credulity
1. 1st-person and 3rd-person perspectives
2. training versus reportage
3. innocent until proven guilty
4. criteria of reliability
- character
- self-consistency
- nature of the claims (coherence with other things we know, e.g., evil or lifelessness of Mars); nature of the conflict with other claims
- personal investment, objectivity
C. Objectivity and intersubjectivity
D. The problem of yogic (mystic) diversity
Some philosophic answers:
1. William James's "piecemeal supernaturalism"
2. W. T. Stace's "core view"
3. Aurobindo's "logic of the Infinite"
4. irreconcilable diversity
E. World views
1. why have a world view?
2. problems of coherence (e.g., God and evil)
3. spirituality without a world view
4. metaphysical minimalism
F. debunking views
1. Hume on miracles (naturalism)
2. psychological debunking (including brain chemistry)
3. sociological debunking